車載用HMIデバイスの評価手法の研究―静止時および運転時のデバイス操作性分析―

• Item type: SIG Technical Reports(1)
• 公開日: 2009-11-05
• タイトル: 車載用HMIデバイスの評価手法の研究―静止時および運転時のデバイス操作性分析―
• タイトル / 言語: en
• タイトル: Evaluating HMI device for in-car systems ― Device usability in static/driving conditions -
• 言語: jpn
• キーワード / 主題Scheme: Other
• キーワード / 主題: セッション１
• 資源タイプ / 資源タイプ識別子: http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18gh
• 資源タイプ: technical report
• 著者所属: 株式会社トヨタIT開発センター
• 著者所属: 日本大学
• 著者所属: 日本大学
• 著者所属: トロント大学
• 著者所属: 株式会社トヨタIT開発センター
• 著者所属: トヨタ自動車株式会社
• 著者所属: トヨタ自動車株式会社
• 著者所属(英): en
• 著者所属(英): Toyota InfoTechnology Center, Co., Ltd.
• 著者所属(英): en
• 著者所属(英): Nihon University
• 著者所属(英): en
• 著者所属(英): Nihon University
• 著者所属(英): en
• 著者所属(英): University of Toronto
• 著者所属(英): en
• 著者所属(英): Toyota InfoTechnology Center, Co., Ltd.
• 著者所属(英): en
• 著者所属(英): Toyota Motor Corporation
• 著者所属(英): en
• 著者所属(英): Toyota Motor Corporation
• 著者名: 溝渕, 佐知; 栗谷川, 幸代; 景山, 一郎; マーク, チグネル; 那和, 一成; 古賀, 光; 久門, 仁
• 著者名(英): Sachi, Mizobuchi; Yukiyo, Kuriyagawa; Ichiro, Kageyama; Mark, Chignell; Kazunari, Nawa; Ko, Koga; Hitoshi, Kumon
• 論文抄録 / 内容記述タイプ: Other
• 論文抄録 / 内容記述: Since there are many different types of user and context, evaluating usability and safety of devices and interfaces used while performing tasks like driving is challenging. Can rated usability of a device in single-task use (core usability) predict safety and performance in multi-tasking contexts, at least as a first approximation? The experiment reported below examined this issue by evaluating three different HMI (human-machine interaction) devices for in-car systems. Thirty-one people performed a menu-selection task with the three devices. Device usability was assessed both with and without an accompanying simulated driving task. The reflected device was clearly worse than the other two (haptic and touchscreen) with respect to its usability in a single task setting, and the reflector interface was also found to be more distracting while driving. This result was confirmed in the driving context by a number of different measures including usability, safety, eye gaze, and steering. In addition, direction of eye gaze and steering stability were found to be useful and unobtrusive measure for evaluating the usability and safety of the HMI. It is concluded that single-task ratings of (core) usability may be useful predictors of the safety and efficiency of HMI devices in vehicles for some contexts.
• 論文抄録(英) / 内容記述タイプ: Other
• 論文抄録(英) / 内容記述: Since there are many different types of user and context, evaluating usability and safety of devices and interfaces used while performing tasks like driving is challenging. Can rated usability of a device in single-task use (core usability) predict safety and performance in multi-tasking contexts, at least as a first approximation? The experiment reported below examined this issue by evaluating three different HMI (human-machine interaction) devices for in-car systems. Thirty-one people performed a menu-selection task with the three devices. Device usability was assessed both with and without an accompanying simulated driving task. The reflected device was clearly worse than the other two (haptic and touchscreen) with respect to its usability in a single task setting, and the reflector interface was also found to be more distracting while driving. This result was confirmed in the driving context by a number of different measures including usability, safety, eye gaze, and steering. In addition, direction of eye gaze and steering stability were found to be useful and unobtrusive measure for evaluating the usability and safety of the HMI. It is concluded that single-task ratings of (core) usability may be useful predictors of the safety and efficiency of HMI devices in vehicles for some contexts.
• 書誌レコードID / 収録物識別子タイプ: NCID
• 書誌レコードID / 収録物識別子: AA11838947
• 書誌情報: 研究報告ユビキタスコンピューティングシステム（UBI）; 巻 2009-UBI-24, 号 1, p. 1-6, 発行日 2009-11-05
• Notice: SIG Technical Reports are nonrefereed and hence may later appear in any journals, conferences, symposia, etc.
• 出版者 / 言語: ja
• 出版者: 情報処理学会