@techreport{oai:ipsj.ixsq.nii.ac.jp:00054692,
 author = {井原, 零 and 河村, 敦 and 畑本, 恵子 and 石原, 茂和 and 林, 春男 and 坂田, 省吾 and 山上, 暁 and Rei, Ihara and Atsushi, Kawamura and Keiko, Hatamoto and Shigekazu, Ishihara and Haruo, Hayashi and Shogo, Sakata and Akira, Yamagami},
 issue = {10(1993-CE-031)},
 month = {Jan},
 note = {心理学分野における，個別学習者・一斉学習場面における教授者・研究者を支援する環境型CAIシステムとしてCTP(mputerized　Textbook　of　Psycholo)システムの開発を行ってきた．CTPシステムの個別学習機能と従来の書籍型テキストとの学習効果を比較するために218名の被験者に対し，学習内容の理解度・ユーザフレンドリネステスト・ドキュメント評価テスト・自覚疲労度の4測度を用いて実験を行った．CTPにおける理解度は書籍型テキストと同様であり，教材としてのおもしろさ・学習に対する動機付けの点では優れていた．自覚疲労においては，一般的VDT作業ほどではないが目の疲れが見られた．, In this paper, we examined the effectiveness of computerized self-learning programs developed for Computerized Textbook of Psychology(CTP for short) project in contrast with traditional method using paper textbook. 218 undergraduates participated in the experiment as a session of psychology course. The experinment consists of "performance", "user friendliness", "documentation measure", and "fatigue" texts. The experimental data revealed: 1)CTP could provide a way of self-instruction in the field of psychology almost as efficient as the traditional way of written textbook. 2)The learner evaluated the learning through CTP was more fun and involving than traditional way. The slight tendency shown in the data suggests: 1)Proper introducion to computerized learning the prerequisite for better peformance. 2) Proper eye care should is be taken for hours of computerized learning.},
 title = {コンピュータ版心理学テキストの作成手法の開発（2）　－CTPと書籍型テキストとの学習効果の比較－},
 year = {1994}
}