{"links":{},"metadata":{"_oai":{"id":"oai:ipsj.ixsq.nii.ac.jp:00051211","sets":["1164:4402:4501:4506"]},"path":["4506"],"owner":"1","recid":"51211","title":["事例を用いた法的推論とその並列化"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"公開日","attribute_value":"1990-03-22"},"_buckets":{"deposit":"6ebeaf2a-d892-4476-a8b0-b3cd25c8758a"},"_deposit":{"id":"51211","pid":{"type":"depid","value":"51211","revision_id":0},"owners":[1],"status":"published","created_by":1},"item_title":"事例を用いた法的推論とその並列化","author_link":["0","0"],"item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"事例を用いた法的推論とその並列化"},{"subitem_title":"Legal Reasoning using Precedents and its Parallel Execution","subitem_title_language":"en"}]},"item_type_id":"4","publish_date":"1990-03-22","item_4_text_3":{"attribute_name":"著者所属","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_value":"新世代コンピュータ技術開発機構"},{"subitem_text_value":"新世代コンピュータ技術開発機構"}]},"item_4_text_4":{"attribute_name":"著者所属(英)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_value":"Institute for New Generation Computer Technology","subitem_text_language":"en"},{"subitem_text_value":"Institute for New Generation Computer Technology","subitem_text_language":"en"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_publisher":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"情報処理学会","subitem_publisher_language":"ja"}]},"publish_status":"0","weko_shared_id":-1,"item_file_price":{"attribute_name":"Billing file","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"url":{"url":"https://ipsj.ixsq.nii.ac.jp/record/51211/files/IPSJ-ICS89069005.pdf"},"date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"1992-03-22"}],"format":"application/pdf","billing":["billing_file"],"filename":"IPSJ-ICS89069005.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"1.6 MB"}],"mimetype":"application/pdf","priceinfo":[{"tax":["include_tax"],"price":"660","billingrole":"5"},{"tax":["include_tax"],"price":"330","billingrole":"6"},{"tax":["include_tax"],"price":"0","billingrole":"25"},{"tax":["include_tax"],"price":"0","billingrole":"44"}],"accessrole":"open_date","version_id":"7d8da389-82d2-4de0-84fd-8ee156ce93a9","displaytype":"detail","licensetype":"license_note","license_note":"Copyright (c) 1990 by the Information Processing Society of Japan"}]},"item_4_creator_5":{"attribute_name":"著者名","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"新田, 克己"},{"creatorName":"星田, 昌紀"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{}]}]},"item_4_creator_6":{"attribute_name":"著者名(英)","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"Katsumi, Nitta","creatorNameLang":"en"},{"creatorName":"Masaki, Hoshida","creatorNameLang":"en"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{}]}]},"item_4_source_id_9":{"attribute_name":"書誌レコードID","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"AA11135936","subitem_source_identifier_type":"NCID"}]},"item_4_textarea_12":{"attribute_name":"Notice","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_textarea_value":"SIG Technical Reports are nonrefereed and hence may later appear in any journals, conferences, symposia, etc."}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18gh","resourcetype":"technical report"}]},"item_4_description_7":{"attribute_name":"論文抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"法律の問題解決を行うときには，法律として与えられた知識をそのまま用いて三段論法を行うのではなく，解釈を伴う法的推論が行われる。解釈を行うときには他の法律や学説や過去の判決例などを参考にすることがあるので，法的推論はある種の事例ベース推論ととらえることが可能である。ここでは事例を用いた法的推論の計算モデルの構築を目的として，解釈の分析と，事例ルールによる事例の表現方法，論理の構築方法などを考察した。特に，事例の一般化や類推適用に伴う問題点について検討した。また，事例の検索と論理構築を並列処理することによって実行時間の短縮を図る方法を示し，論理型言語KL1による実験によってその効果を確認した。さらに法律システムの構築のための推論エンジンHELIC-IIの構成について説明した。","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_4_description_8":{"attribute_name":"論文抄録(英)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"Legal Reasoning is composed of finding of facts, interpretation of the law and application to the facts. To interpret the law, other law or precedents are often referred. Therefore, legal reasoning is a kind of case-based reasoning. In this paper, we discuss the model of legal reasoning such as representing precedents and constructing explanations. Especially, problems on generalizing precedents and making use of decisions of similar cases are discussed. Furthermore, the parallel way of executing legal reasoning in logic programming language KL1 is proposed and the inference engine for legal expert system is introduced.","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_4_biblio_info_10":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicPageEnd":"10","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"情報処理学会研究報告知能と複雑系（ICS）"}],"bibliographicPageStart":"1","bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"1990-03-22","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicIssueNumber":"26(1989-ICS-069)","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"1990"}]},"relation_version_is_last":true,"weko_creator_id":"1"},"updated":"2025-01-22T07:17:44.545474+00:00","created":"2025-01-18T23:15:48.454289+00:00","id":51211}