{"metadata":{"_oai":{"id":"oai:ipsj.ixsq.nii.ac.jp:00048862","sets":["1164:4179:4250:4253"]},"path":["4253"],"owner":"1","recid":"48862","title":["固有名詞抽出における日本語と英語の比較"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"公開日","attribute_value":"1998-07-23"},"_buckets":{"deposit":"88249b1f-5521-4c8f-bbee-f6f1aba58974"},"_deposit":{"id":"48862","pid":{"type":"depid","value":"48862","revision_id":0},"owners":[1],"status":"published","created_by":1},"item_title":"固有名詞抽出における日本語と英語の比較","author_link":["0","0"],"item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"固有名詞抽出における日本語と英語の比較"},{"subitem_title":"Comparison of Japanese and English Named Entity Recognition","subitem_title_language":"en"}]},"item_type_id":"4","publish_date":"1998-07-23","item_4_text_3":{"attribute_name":"著者所属","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_value":"沖電気工業（株）研究開発本部関西総合研究所"},{"subitem_text_value":"沖電気工業（株）研究開発本部関西総合研究所"},{"subitem_text_value":"沖電気工業（株）研究開発本部関西総合研究所"}]},"item_4_text_4":{"attribute_name":"著者所属(英)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_value":"Kansai Laboratory, R&D Group, Oki Electric Ind. Co., Ltd.","subitem_text_language":"en"},{"subitem_text_value":"Kansai Laboratory, R&D Group, Oki Electric Ind. Co., Ltd.","subitem_text_language":"en"},{"subitem_text_value":"Kansai Laboratory, R&D Group, Oki Electric Ind. Co., Ltd.","subitem_text_language":"en"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_publisher":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"情報処理学会","subitem_publisher_language":"ja"}]},"publish_status":"0","weko_shared_id":-1,"item_file_price":{"attribute_name":"Billing file","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"url":{"url":"https://ipsj.ixsq.nii.ac.jp/record/48862/files/IPSJ-NL98126015.pdf"},"date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2000-07-23"}],"format":"application/pdf","billing":["billing_file"],"filename":"IPSJ-NL98126015.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"796.6 kB"}],"mimetype":"application/pdf","priceinfo":[{"tax":["include_tax"],"price":"660","billingrole":"5"},{"tax":["include_tax"],"price":"330","billingrole":"6"},{"tax":["include_tax"],"price":"0","billingrole":"23"},{"tax":["include_tax"],"price":"0","billingrole":"44"}],"accessrole":"open_date","version_id":"d0d12b41-73ab-488b-bd44-e249bcb3a2a4","displaytype":"detail","licensetype":"license_note","license_note":"Copyright (c) 1998 by the Information Processing Society of Japan"}]},"item_4_creator_5":{"attribute_name":"著者名","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"福本, 淳一"},{"creatorName":"下畑, 光夫"},{"creatorName":"桝井, 文人"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{}]}]},"item_4_creator_6":{"attribute_name":"著者名(英)","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"Jun-Ichi, Fukumoto","creatorNameLang":"en"},{"creatorName":"Mitsuo, Shimohata","creatorNameLang":"en"},{"creatorName":"Fumito, Masui","creatorNameLang":"en"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{}]}]},"item_4_source_id_9":{"attribute_name":"書誌レコードID","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"AN10115061","subitem_source_identifier_type":"NCID"}]},"item_4_textarea_12":{"attribute_name":"Notice","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_textarea_value":"SIG Technical Reports are nonrefereed and hence may later appear in any journals, conferences, symposia, etc."}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18gh","resourcetype":"technical report"}]},"item_4_description_7":{"attribute_name":"論文抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"本稿では、7th Message Understanding Conference (MUC-7)において報告した日本語と英語の固有名詞抽出システムの抽出精度の比較結果について報告する。システムの比較は、抽出を行った抽出項目と抽出のための各モジュールの観点から行った。まず、各システムの構成と抽出方式について述べた後、MUC-7のformal runテストで用いた新聞記事100テキストを用いた場合のシステムの精度について述べる。最後に抽出結果から両システムの比較について述べる。","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_4_description_8":{"attribute_name":"論文抄録(英)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"In this paper, we discuss comparison between Japanese and English Named Entity (NE) Recognition System which have been submitted to the 7th Message Understanding Conference (MUC-7). The comparison is done on the point of the kinds of NE types and recognition modules. Firstly, we will show system architecture and recognition mechanism of both NE systems. Then we will report system performance of the NE systems using 100 texts which are utilized in the formal run test of MUC-7 evaluation. Finally, we will discuss the comparison of the systems.","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_4_biblio_info_10":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicPageEnd":"114","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"情報処理学会研究報告自然言語処理（NL）"}],"bibliographicPageStart":"107","bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"1998-07-23","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicIssueNumber":"63(1998-NL-126)","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"1998"}]},"relation_version_is_last":true,"weko_creator_id":"1"},"id":48862,"updated":"2025-01-22T08:18:20.934006+00:00","links":{},"created":"2025-01-18T23:14:00.507360+00:00"}