Differences in Perspectives between Facility Managers and Crowd Workers in Accessibility Mapping

• Item type: Journal(1)
• 公開日: 2025-01-15
• タイトル: Differences in Perspectives between Facility Managers and Crowd Workers in Accessibility Mapping
• タイトル / 言語: en
• タイトル: Differences in Perspectives between Facility Managers and Crowd Workers in Accessibility Mapping
• 言語: eng
• キーワード / 主題Scheme: Other
• キーワード / 主題: [特集:人々の幸福で豊かな暮らしを支えるコラボレーション技術とネットワークサービス（テクニカルノート）] accessibility map, crowdsourcing, gamification
• 資源タイプ / 資源タイプ識別子: http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
• 資源タイプ: journal article
• 著者所属: College of Humanities and Scicences, Nihon University
• 著者所属(英): en
• 著者所属(英): College of Humanities and Scicences, Nihon University
• 著者名: Akihiro, Miyata
• 著者名(英): Akihiro, Miyata
• 論文抄録 / 内容記述タイプ: Other
• 論文抄録 / 内容記述: This study compared an official accessibility map and a crowdsourced accessibility map for a university campus to identify differences between the two types of maps. By conducting a comprehensive analysis of the responses from the official map creator and accessibility problems reported by 35 crowd workers, we provided the following four suggestions: S1, it is desirable to avoid omitting the creation of official maps and to allow both types of maps to coexist; S2, it would be desirable for various stakeholders to participate as crowd workers in reporting accessibility problems; S3, problems along the routes leading to building entrances could be supplemented through crowdsourcing; and S4, dynamically changing accessibility problems could be captured through crowdsourcing. These suggestions based on detailed comparisons contribute to the improvement of both official and crowdsourced accessibility mapping.; ------------------------------; This is a preprint of an article intended for publication Journal of; Information Processing(JIP). This preprint should not be cited. This; article should be cited as: Journal of Information Processing Vol.33(2025) (online); DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.2197/ipsjjip.33.2; ------------------------------
• 論文抄録(英) / 内容記述タイプ: Other
• 論文抄録(英) / 内容記述: This study compared an official accessibility map and a crowdsourced accessibility map for a university campus to identify differences between the two types of maps. By conducting a comprehensive analysis of the responses from the official map creator and accessibility problems reported by 35 crowd workers, we provided the following four suggestions: S1, it is desirable to avoid omitting the creation of official maps and to allow both types of maps to coexist; S2, it would be desirable for various stakeholders to participate as crowd workers in reporting accessibility problems; S3, problems along the routes leading to building entrances could be supplemented through crowdsourcing; and S4, dynamically changing accessibility problems could be captured through crowdsourcing. These suggestions based on detailed comparisons contribute to the improvement of both official and crowdsourced accessibility mapping.; ------------------------------; This is a preprint of an article intended for publication Journal of; Information Processing(JIP). This preprint should not be cited. This; article should be cited as: Journal of Information Processing Vol.33(2025) (online); DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.2197/ipsjjip.33.2; ------------------------------
• 書誌レコードID / 収録物識別子タイプ: NCID
• 書誌レコードID / 収録物識別子: AN00116647
• 書誌情報: 情報処理学会論文誌; 巻 66, 号 1, 発行日 2025-01-15
• ISSN / 収録物識別子タイプ: ISSN
• ISSN / 収録物識別子: 1882-7764
• 公開者 / 言語: ja
• 公開者 / 出版者: 情報処理学会