{"updated":"2025-01-19T10:17:26.554603+00:00","metadata":{"_oai":{"id":"oai:ipsj.ixsq.nii.ac.jp:00232880","sets":["1164:4179:11560:11561"]},"path":["11561"],"owner":"44499","recid":"232880","title":["複数文書要約を用いた事実性の検証"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"公開日","attribute_value":"2024-03-03"},"_buckets":{"deposit":"404398de-2c7a-465c-8096-f435202bb0e5"},"_deposit":{"id":"232880","pid":{"type":"depid","value":"232880","revision_id":0},"owners":[44499],"status":"published","created_by":44499},"item_title":"複数文書要約を用いた事実性の検証","author_link":["631405","631404","631406"],"item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"複数文書要約を用いた事実性の検証"},{"subitem_title":"Fact Checking by Multi-document Summarization","subitem_title_language":"en"}]},"item_keyword":{"attribute_name":"キーワード","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"応用","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"}]},"item_type_id":"4","publish_date":"2024-03-03","item_4_text_3":{"attribute_name":"著者所属","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_value":"現在，東京工業大学"},{"subitem_text_value":"現在，東京工業大学"},{"subitem_text_value":"現在，東京工業大学"}]},"item_4_text_4":{"attribute_name":"著者所属(英)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_value":"Presently with Tokyo Institute of Technology","subitem_text_language":"en"},{"subitem_text_value":"Presently with Tokyo Institute of Technology","subitem_text_language":"en"},{"subitem_text_value":"Presently with Tokyo Institute of Technology","subitem_text_language":"en"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_publisher":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"情報処理学会","subitem_publisher_language":"ja"}]},"publish_status":"0","weko_shared_id":-1,"item_file_price":{"attribute_name":"Billing file","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"url":{"url":"https://ipsj.ixsq.nii.ac.jp/record/232880/files/IPSJ-NL24259017.pdf","label":"IPSJ-NL24259017.pdf"},"date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2026-03-03"}],"format":"application/pdf","billing":["billing_file"],"filename":"IPSJ-NL24259017.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"717.4 kB"}],"mimetype":"application/pdf","priceinfo":[{"tax":["include_tax"],"price":"660","billingrole":"5"},{"tax":["include_tax"],"price":"330","billingrole":"6"},{"tax":["include_tax"],"price":"0","billingrole":"23"},{"tax":["include_tax"],"price":"0","billingrole":"44"}],"accessrole":"open_date","version_id":"8918f795-2198-4819-a8a1-b1fbb5ed7ee4","displaytype":"detail","licensetype":"license_note","license_note":"Copyright (c) 2024 by the Information Processing Society of Japan"}]},"item_4_creator_5":{"attribute_name":"著者名","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"伊藤, 悠馬"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{}]},{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"山田, 寛章"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{}]},{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"徳永, 健伸"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{}]}]},"item_4_source_id_9":{"attribute_name":"書誌レコードID","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"AN10115061","subitem_source_identifier_type":"NCID"}]},"item_4_textarea_12":{"attribute_name":"Notice","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_textarea_value":"SIG Technical Reports are nonrefereed and hence may later appear in any journals, conferences, symposia, etc."}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18gh","resourcetype":"technical report"}]},"item_4_source_id_11":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"2188-8779","subitem_source_identifier_type":"ISSN"}]},"item_4_description_7":{"attribute_name":"論文抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"事実性検証の対象となる主張文章の中には複数の文章を情報源として参照し，複数段階の推論を経ることで初めて正しい判定ができる主張文章が存在する．本研究ではこのような主張文章に適した事実性検証の仕組みとして，要約-判定アーキテクチャを提案する．提案手法では，1 段階目に情報源として与えられた複数の文書の中から主張文章を支持する部分を複数文書要約し，2 段階目では生成した要約を用いて主張文章の事実性判定を行う．1 段階目で情報源の文書を短く要約することにより，主張文章の判定で大規模言語モデルの推論能力を有効活用することを狙う．提案手法の性能を HoVer[1] データセットを用いて評価したところ，従来のアプローチを超える性能を達成した．","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_4_description_8":{"attribute_name":"論文抄録(英)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"In the fact-checking task, there are claims that need multiple source documents and multi-step reasoning. In this research, we propose a summary-judge architecture, which is good at judging those claims. Firstly, the summary-judge architecture summarizes the given multiple source documents to extract information that supports the claim. Secondly, the architecture judges the claim using the generated summaries. By summarizing the given source documents into summaries, we aim to bring out the reasoning ability of the Large Language Model. We evaluate our summary-judge architecture on HoVer[1], and it outperforms previous approaches.","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_4_biblio_info_10":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicPageEnd":"9","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"研究報告自然言語処理（NL）"}],"bibliographicPageStart":"1","bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2024-03-03","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicIssueNumber":"17","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"2024-NL-259"}]},"relation_version_is_last":true,"weko_creator_id":"44499"},"created":"2025-01-19T01:34:00.319160+00:00","id":232880,"links":{}}