@inproceedings{oai:ipsj.ixsq.nii.ac.jp:00231378,
 author = {青山, 美月 and 村井, 源 and Mitsuki, Aoyama  Hajime Murai},
 book = {じんもんこん2023論文集},
 month = {Dec},
 note = {本論文では，推理小説における作家固有の伏線やオチの特徴が存在すると仮定し，古典作品と江戸川乱歩作品に含まれる伏線とオチ，伏線やオチが出現するシーンとの関係の比較分析を行った．作品群ごとの伏線とオチの出現頻度を比較し因子分析を用いることで，伏線とオチ，伏線やオチが出現するシーンとの関係を明らかにした．また，古典作品と江戸川乱歩作品での傾向を比較することで江戸川乱歩作品では 虚偽の証言だと発覚したことによって事件の真相が明かされる伏線が多く，古典作品と比較し，物語中での解釈が変容する伏線が少ないという 特徴が存在することが明らかになった．, In this paper, assuming the existence of author -specific characteristics of foreshadowing and punchlines in mystery novels, we conducted a comparative analysis of the relationship between foreshadowing and punchlines, and scenes in which foreshadowing an d punchlines appear in classic works and Edogawa Rampo's works. By comparing the frequency of occurrence of foreshadowing lines and punchlines in each work group and using factor analysis, we clarified the relationship between foreshadowing lines and punch lines, as well as scenes in which foreshadowing lines and punchlines appear. By comparing the trends between classic works and Edogawa Rampo's works, it was found that Edogawa Rampo's works have more foreshadowing in which the truth of the case is revealed when it is discovered that the testimony is false, and less foreshadowing in which the interpretation changes in the story compared to classic works.},
 pages = {297--304},
 publisher = {情報処理学会},
 title = {推理小説における作家固有の伏線とオチ，シーンとの関係についての傾向の分析},
 volume = {2023},
 year = {2023}
}