{"metadata":{"_oai":{"id":"oai:ipsj.ixsq.nii.ac.jp:00219571","sets":["1164:5251:10854:11006"]},"path":["11006"],"owner":"44499","recid":"219571","title":["インターネット上の人格権侵害に対する差止請求"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"公開日","attribute_value":"2022-08-25"},"_buckets":{"deposit":"4b574105-4157-41fc-b87e-6026bd6e16db"},"_deposit":{"id":"219571","pid":{"type":"depid","value":"219571","revision_id":0},"owners":[44499],"status":"published","created_by":44499},"item_title":"インターネット上の人格権侵害に対する差止請求","author_link":["572796","572795"],"item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"インターネット上の人格権侵害に対する差止請求"},{"subitem_title":"Discussions on remedy of injunction for rights infringement on the Internet","subitem_title_language":"en"}]},"item_keyword":{"attribute_name":"キーワード","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"情報法・経済（EIP）","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"}]},"item_type_id":"4","publish_date":"2022-08-25","item_4_text_3":{"attribute_name":"著者所属","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_value":"中央大学"}]},"item_4_text_4":{"attribute_name":"著者所属(英)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_value":"Chuo University","subitem_text_language":"en"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_publisher":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"情報処理学会","subitem_publisher_language":"ja"}]},"publish_status":"0","weko_shared_id":-1,"item_file_price":{"attribute_name":"Billing file","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"url":{"url":"https://ipsj.ixsq.nii.ac.jp/record/219571/files/IPSJ-EIP22097014.pdf","label":"IPSJ-EIP22097014.pdf"},"date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2024-08-25"}],"format":"application/pdf","billing":["billing_file"],"filename":"IPSJ-EIP22097014.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"941.2 kB"}],"mimetype":"application/pdf","priceinfo":[{"tax":["include_tax"],"price":"660","billingrole":"5"},{"tax":["include_tax"],"price":"330","billingrole":"6"},{"tax":["include_tax"],"price":"0","billingrole":"26"},{"tax":["include_tax"],"price":"0","billingrole":"44"}],"accessrole":"open_date","version_id":"0054f98e-700e-473f-8e84-45c925496eb4","displaytype":"detail","licensetype":"license_note","license_note":"Copyright (c) 2022 by the Information Processing Society of Japan"}]},"item_4_creator_5":{"attribute_name":"著者名","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"小向, 太郎"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{}]}]},"item_4_creator_6":{"attribute_name":"著者名(英)","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"Taro, Komukai","creatorNameLang":"en"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{}]}]},"item_4_source_id_9":{"attribute_name":"書誌レコードID","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"AA11238429","subitem_source_identifier_type":"NCID"}]},"item_4_textarea_12":{"attribute_name":"Notice","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_textarea_value":"SIG Technical Reports are nonrefereed and hence may later appear in any journals, conferences, symposia, etc."}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18gh","resourcetype":"technical report"}]},"item_4_source_id_11":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"2188-8647","subitem_source_identifier_type":"ISSN"}]},"item_4_description_7":{"attribute_name":"論文抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"インターネット上の名誉毀損やプライバシー侵害に対する法的救済には，損害賠償請求と，差止請求がある．表現行為の差止請求については，表現の自由に対する影響が大きいことから，慎重に判断されるべきという考え方がある．インターネット上の人格権侵害に関して，媒介者に対してどのような場合に削除等の請求が認められるかについては，インターネットが普及し始めた当初から議論がなされてきた．最近も，最高裁判所が，ツイッターに対する削除請求について，グーグルのような検索サービスとは異なる基準で削除を認める判断を示している（最二小判令和 4 年 6 月 24 日）．本稿では，インターネット上の人格権侵害に関する媒介者に対する差止請求について，現在の判例の考え方を整理し，課題を考察する．","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_4_description_8":{"attribute_name":"論文抄録(英)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"Legal remedies for defamation and invasion of privacy on the internet include claims for damages and injunctions. There is a view that claims for injunctions against expressive acts should be judged carefully because of their impact on freedom of speech. There has been debate as to when a claim for removal can be made against an intermediary for such infringing acts on the internet. Recently, the Supreme Court ruled that removal claims against Twitter are admissible under different criteria than those against search services such as Google. This article focuses on current case law on injunctive claims for defamation and invasion of privacy on the internet.","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_4_biblio_info_10":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicPageEnd":"5","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"研究報告電子化知的財産・社会基盤（EIP）"}],"bibliographicPageStart":"1","bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2022-08-25","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicIssueNumber":"14","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"2022-EIP-97"}]},"relation_version_is_last":true,"weko_creator_id":"44499"},"id":219571,"updated":"2025-01-19T14:50:50.412596+00:00","links":{},"created":"2025-01-19T01:19:38.610238+00:00"}