{"created":"2025-01-19T01:11:33.169842+00:00","updated":"2025-01-19T18:11:52.916250+00:00","metadata":{"_oai":{"id":"oai:ipsj.ixsq.nii.ac.jp:00210322","sets":["6164:6165:9654:10560"]},"path":["10560"],"owner":"44499","recid":"210322","title":["Response Time Analysis of Execution Right Delegation Scheduling"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"公開日","attribute_value":"2021-03-15"},"_buckets":{"deposit":"d6889f4a-a850-417c-a9d9-b3505232de1a"},"_deposit":{"id":"210322","pid":{"type":"depid","value":"210322","revision_id":0},"owners":[44499],"status":"published","created_by":44499},"item_title":"Response Time Analysis of Execution Right Delegation Scheduling","author_link":["532162","532160","532163","532161"],"item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"Response Time Analysis of Execution Right Delegation Scheduling"},{"subitem_title":"Response Time Analysis of Execution Right Delegation Scheduling","subitem_title_language":"en"}]},"item_type_id":"18","publish_date":"2021-03-15","item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"eng"}]},"item_18_text_3":{"attribute_name":"著者所属","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_value":"Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology"},{"subitem_text_value":"Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology"}]},"item_18_text_4":{"attribute_name":"著者所属(英)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_value":"Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology","subitem_text_language":"en"},{"subitem_text_value":"Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology","subitem_text_language":"en"}]},"item_publisher":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"情報処理学会","subitem_publisher_language":"ja"}]},"publish_status":"0","weko_shared_id":-1,"item_file_price":{"attribute_name":"Billing file","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"url":{"url":"https://ipsj.ixsq.nii.ac.jp/record/210322/files/IPSJ-APRIS2020006.pdf","label":"IPSJ-APRIS2020006.pdf"},"date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2021-03-15"}],"format":"application/pdf","billing":["billing_file"],"filename":"IPSJ-APRIS2020006.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"1.4 MB"}],"mimetype":"application/pdf","priceinfo":[{"tax":["include_tax"],"price":"0","billingrole":"5"},{"tax":["include_tax"],"price":"0","billingrole":"6"},{"tax":["include_tax"],"price":"0","billingrole":"42"},{"tax":["include_tax"],"price":"0","billingrole":"44"}],"accessrole":"open_date","version_id":"12a9b041-2014-49a0-b85e-a1e86943f667","displaytype":"detail","licensetype":"license_note","license_note":"Copyright (c) 2021 by the Information Processing Society of Japan"}]},"item_18_creator_5":{"attribute_name":"著者名","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"Takaharu, Suzuki"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{}]},{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"Kiyofumi, Tanaka"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{}]}]},"item_18_creator_6":{"attribute_name":"著者名(英)","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"Takaharu, Suzuki","creatorNameLang":"en"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{}]},{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"Kiyofumi, Tanaka","creatorNameLang":"en"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{}]}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794","resourcetype":"conference paper"}]},"item_18_description_7":{"attribute_name":"論文抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"In scheduling algorithms based on Rate Monotonic (RM) method widely used in development of real-time systems, tasks with shorter periods have higher priorities. In contrast, ones with longer periods are likely to suffer from increased response times and jitters due to their lower priorities. Execution Right Delegation (ERD) we proposed is a method based on RM where a high-priority server for particular (or important) tasks is introduced to shorten response time and jitter of the tasks. Our previous work showed ERD improves real-time processing of the target tasks through simulations. However, Response Time Analysis (RTA), which assures worst case response time of the task, was left to future work. This paper shows RTA for ERD and evaluates it by comparing with a Deadline Monotonic method and ERD simulation results.","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_18_description_8":{"attribute_name":"論文抄録(英)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"In scheduling algorithms based on Rate Monotonic (RM) method widely used in development of real-time systems, tasks with shorter periods have higher priorities. In contrast, ones with longer periods are likely to suffer from increased response times and jitters due to their lower priorities. Execution Right Delegation (ERD) we proposed is a method based on RM where a high-priority server for particular (or important) tasks is introduced to shorten response time and jitter of the tasks. Our previous work showed ERD improves real-time processing of the target tasks through simulations. However, Response Time Analysis (RTA), which assures worst case response time of the task, was left to future work. This paper shows RTA for ERD and evaluates it by comparing with a Deadline Monotonic method and ERD simulation results.","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_18_biblio_info_10":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicPageEnd":"38","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"Proceedings of Asia Pacific Conference on Robot IoT System Development and Platform"}],"bibliographicPageStart":"32","bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2021-03-15","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicVolumeNumber":"2020"}]},"relation_version_is_last":true,"weko_creator_id":"44499"},"id":210322,"links":{}}