@techreport{oai:ipsj.ixsq.nii.ac.jp:00209990,
 author = {林, 浩一 and Koichi, Hayashi},
 issue = {23},
 month = {Mar},
 note = {戦略コンサルティング会社に由来するロジカルシンキングの手法は，説得力のある提案や報告の作成に効果的なことから広く普及している．大学などの教育機関で教授するための手段として，基礎的な論理構造を反転論証図という形式で記述する演習を行った結果，主張 (結論) と根拠の関係を取り違える誤りが高い頻度で発生することがわかった．誤り事例の分析から，原因が因果関係との混同であるという仮説を示し改善の指針を探る．またこの誤りが読解力の測定に使用できる可能性に触れる．, Logical thinking techniques derived from consulting firms are widespread because they are effective in creating compelling proposals and convincing reports. As a means of teaching at educational institutions including universities, we conducted short drills that describe basic logical structures in the form of an inverted argument diagram and found students frequently fail to treat the relationship between claims (conclusions) and grounds correctly. As the hypothesis from the analysis of the failure cases, we present that they are caused by confusion with causal relationship and discuss the way to improve the results. We also touch possibility that the drills can be used to measure reading skills of students.},
 title = {ロジカルシンキング授業での論証図の誤答発生とその原因仮説},
 year = {2021}
}