ログイン 新規登録
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 研究報告
  2. 量子ソフトウェア(QS)
  3. 2020
  4. 2020-QS-001

Trusted centerによる量子計算の古典検証

https://ipsj.ixsq.nii.ac.jp/records/207294
https://ipsj.ixsq.nii.ac.jp/records/207294
f6a4f676-aa8e-4e00-97cc-796daf49ee6c
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
IPSJ-QS20001008.pdf IPSJ-QS20001008.pdf (677.7 kB)
Copyright (c) 2020 by the Information Processing Society of Japan
オープンアクセス
Item type SIG Technical Reports(1)
公開日 2020-10-09
タイトル
タイトル Trusted centerによる量子計算の古典検証
タイトル
言語 en
タイトル Classical verification of quantum computing with trusted center
言語
言語 eng
資源タイプ
資源タイプ識別子 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18gh
資源タイプ technical report
著者所属
京都大学基礎物理学研究所
著者所属
NTTコミュニケーション科学基礎研究所
著者名 森前, 智行

× 森前, 智行

森前, 智行

Search repository
竹内, 勇貴

× 竹内, 勇貴

竹内, 勇貴

Search repository
論文抄録
内容記述タイプ Other
内容記述 The classical channel remote state preparation (ccRSP) is an important two-party primitive in quantum cryptography. Alice (classical polynomial-time) and Bob (quantum polynomial-time) exchange polynomial rounds of classical messages, and Bob finally gets random single-qubit states while Alice finally gets classical descriptions of the states. In [T. Morimae, arXiv:2003.10712], an information-theoretically-sound non-interactive protocol for the verification of quantum computing was proposed. The verifier of the protocol is classical, but the trusted center is assumed that sends random single-qubit states to the prover and their classical descriptions to the verifier. If the trusted center can be replaced with a ccRSP protocol while keeping the information-theoretical soundness, an information-theoretically-sound classical verification of quantum computing is possible, which solves the long-standing open problem. In this paper, we show that it is not the case unless BQP is contained in MA. We also consider a general verification protocol where the verifier or the trusted center first sends quantum states to the prover, and then the prover and the verifier exchange a constant round of classical messages. We show that the first quantum message transmission cannot be replaced with a ccRSP protocol while keeping the information-theoretical soundness unless BQP is contained in AM. Furthermore, we also study the verification with the computational soundness. We show that if a ccRSP protocol satisfies a certain condition even against any quantum polynomial-time malicious prover, the replacement of the trusted center with the ccRSP protocol realizes a computationally-sound classical verification of quantum computing. The condition is weaker than the verifiability of the ccRSP. At this moment, however, there is no known ccRSP protocol that satisfies the condition. If a simple construction of such a ccRSP protocol is found, the combination of it with the trusted center verification model provides another simpler and modular proof of the Mahadev's result. We finally show that the trusted center model and its variant with the ccRSP have extractors for low-energy states. For details, see [T. Morimae and Y. Takeuchi, arXiv:2008.05033]
論文抄録(英)
内容記述タイプ Other
内容記述 The classical channel remote state preparation (ccRSP) is an important two-party primitive in quantum cryptography. Alice (classical polynomial-time) and Bob (quantum polynomial-time) exchange polynomial rounds of classical messages, and Bob finally gets random single-qubit states while Alice finally gets classical descriptions of the states. In [T. Morimae, arXiv:2003.10712], an information-theoretically-sound non-interactive protocol for the verification of quantum computing was proposed. The verifier of the protocol is classical, but the trusted center is assumed that sends random single-qubit states to the prover and their classical descriptions to the verifier. If the trusted center can be replaced with a ccRSP protocol while keeping the information-theoretical soundness, an information-theoretically-sound classical verification of quantum computing is possible, which solves the long-standing open problem. In this paper, we show that it is not the case unless BQP is contained in MA. We also consider a general verification protocol where the verifier or the trusted center first sends quantum states to the prover, and then the prover and the verifier exchange a constant round of classical messages. We show that the first quantum message transmission cannot be replaced with a ccRSP protocol while keeping the information-theoretical soundness unless BQP is contained in AM. Furthermore, we also study the verification with the computational soundness. We show that if a ccRSP protocol satisfies a certain condition even against any quantum polynomial-time malicious prover, the replacement of the trusted center with the ccRSP protocol realizes a computationally-sound classical verification of quantum computing. The condition is weaker than the verifiability of the ccRSP. At this moment, however, there is no known ccRSP protocol that satisfies the condition. If a simple construction of such a ccRSP protocol is found, the combination of it with the trusted center verification model provides another simpler and modular proof of the Mahadev's result. We finally show that the trusted center model and its variant with the ccRSP have extractors for low-energy states. For details, see [T. Morimae and Y. Takeuchi, arXiv:2008.05033]
書誌レコードID
収録物識別子タイプ NCID
収録物識別子 AA12894105
書誌情報 研究報告量子ソフトウェア(QS)

巻 2020-QS-1, 号 8, p. 1-6, 発行日 2020-10-09
ISSN
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 2435-6492
Notice
SIG Technical Reports are nonrefereed and hence may later appear in any journals, conferences, symposia, etc.
出版者
言語 ja
出版者 情報処理学会
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2025-01-19 19:12:06.022213
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3