@article{oai:ipsj.ixsq.nii.ac.jp:00160380,
 author = {奈加, 大樹 and 森崎, 修司 and 渥美, 紀寿 and 山本, 修一郎 and Daiki, Naka and Shuji, Morisaki and Noritoshi, Atsumi and Shuichirou, Yamamoto},
 issue = {5},
 journal = {情報処理学会論文誌},
 month = {May},
 note = {ソフトウェア設計書を目視を要さず網羅的に評価することを目指し，14件の基本設計書（A群），14件の要求仕様書（R群），3組の同一ソフトウェアの基本設計書と要求仕様書の組（AR群）を用いて実証的に評価した．具体的には，単語の最低出現頻度を変化させながら，A群の基本設計書の間で共通語彙が存在するかを確かめた．次に，AR群の基本設計書において対となる要求仕様書よりも共通語彙が大きい割合で含まれるか確かめた．評価の結果，最低出現頻度を0.05%, 0.10%, 0.15%に設定した場合でも共通語彙が存在した．共通語彙に10単語以上が含まれる場合には，AR群の基本設計書のほうが対になる要求仕様書よりも大きい割合で共通語彙を含むことが分かった．基本設計書の評価を，対になる要求仕様書に含まれる単語と共通語彙を用いて，実施できる可能性が示唆された．, Toward automated comprehensive evaluation of software design document, we conducted an empirical evaluation with fourteen software architecture design documents (group A), fourteen requirement specification documents (group R), and three sets of architecture design document and requirement specification document of the same software (group AR). The evaluation investigates whether software architecture design documents (group A) have common terms, and whether each architecture design document includes larger percent of the common terms than the corresponding requirement specification in three sets of documents AR. The results of the evaluation show that common terms among the group A documents exist with minimum term frequency thresholds 0.05%, 0.10%, and 0.15%. The results also show that each architecture design document includes larger percentage of the common terms that have more than 10 terms. The results indicate that common terms have potential to evaluate level of fineness of description of software architecture design document.},
 pages = {1464--1476},
 title = {共通語彙によるソフトウェア設計書の評価にむけた分析},
 volume = {57},
 year = {2016}
}