{"updated":"2025-01-20T19:26:29.494840+00:00","metadata":{"_oai":{"id":"oai:ipsj.ixsq.nii.ac.jp:00141302","sets":["1164:3027:7765:8211"]},"path":["8211"],"owner":"11","recid":"141302","title":["表示媒体の違いが誤りを探す読みに与える影響"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"公開日","attribute_value":"2015-03-06"},"_buckets":{"deposit":"a7342c39-132d-4a1e-9d2e-0d65aae50057"},"_deposit":{"id":"141302","pid":{"type":"depid","value":"141302","revision_id":0},"owners":[11],"status":"published","created_by":11},"item_title":"表示媒体の違いが誤りを探す読みに与える影響","author_link":["205718","205716","205719","205717"],"item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"表示媒体の違いが誤りを探す読みに与える影響"},{"subitem_title":"Effects of Different Display Media on Proofreading Effectiveness","subitem_title_language":"en"}]},"item_type_id":"4","publish_date":"2015-03-06","item_4_text_3":{"attribute_name":"著者所属","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_value":"筑波大学情報学群知識情報・図書館学類"},{"subitem_text_value":"筑波大学図書館情報メディア系"}]},"item_4_text_4":{"attribute_name":"著者所属(英)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_value":"Knowledge and Library Sciences, School of Informatics, University of Tsukuba","subitem_text_language":"en"},{"subitem_text_value":"Faculty of Library, Information and Media Science, University of Tsukuba","subitem_text_language":"en"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_publisher":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"情報処理学会","subitem_publisher_language":"ja"}]},"publish_status":"0","weko_shared_id":-1,"item_file_price":{"attribute_name":"Billing file","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"url":{"url":"https://ipsj.ixsq.nii.ac.jp/record/141302/files/IPSJ-HCI15162002.pdf"},"date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2017-03-06"}],"format":"application/pdf","billing":["billing_file"],"filename":"IPSJ-HCI15162002.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"783.7 kB"}],"mimetype":"application/pdf","priceinfo":[{"tax":["include_tax"],"price":"660","billingrole":"5"},{"tax":["include_tax"],"price":"330","billingrole":"6"},{"tax":["include_tax"],"price":"0","billingrole":"33"},{"tax":["include_tax"],"price":"0","billingrole":"44"}],"accessrole":"open_date","version_id":"2dad82a4-b179-4139-b682-cc7da64629f5","displaytype":"detail","licensetype":"license_note","license_note":"Copyright (c) 2015 by the Information Processing Society of Japan"}]},"item_4_creator_5":{"attribute_name":"著者名","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"松山, 麻珠"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{}]},{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"池内, 淳"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{}]}]},"item_4_creator_6":{"attribute_name":"著者名(英)","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"Asami, Matsuyama","creatorNameLang":"en"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{}]},{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"Atsushi, Ikeuchi","creatorNameLang":"en"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{}]}]},"item_4_source_id_9":{"attribute_name":"書誌レコードID","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"AA1221543X","subitem_source_identifier_type":"NCID"}]},"item_4_textarea_12":{"attribute_name":"Notice","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_textarea_value":"SIG Technical Reports are nonrefereed and hence may later appear in any journals, conferences, symposia, etc."}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18gh","resourcetype":"technical report"}]},"item_4_description_7":{"attribute_name":"論文抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"本稿では，校正を行う場面での読みにおける作業効率の差や校正者が受ける影響を測定するとともに，その要因を考察することを目的として二つの実験を行った．実験 1 では，24 名の被験者に対して，2 種類の問題を用いて実験を行い，校正作業の効率，正解率，主観評価いずれにおいても液晶ディスプレイに比べ，紙の方が優れていた．実験1の結果を踏まえ，その違いとなる具体的な要因を探るため，反射光と透過光の違いに着目した実験を 20 名の被験者を対象として実施した．その結果，誤り発見数・誤回答数・読書時間・主観評価について差は認められなかったものの，誤り発見数の平均値，校正作業の精度と再現率について反射光のほうが優位であった．","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_4_description_8":{"attribute_name":"論文抄録(英)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"This study aims to measure effect of various media on proofreaders' efficiency and to consider causative factors for errors. We conducted two experiments: Experiment 1 compared hardcopy and liquid crystal display (LCD); Experiment 2 compared e-book media's screen types. In Experiment 1, 24 participants read about the same subject via different media, paper and LCD. Regarding errors, paper was better for efficient work and subjective evaluation. Based on the results of Experiment 1, we conducted Experiment 2 focusing on differences between reflected and transmitted light with 20 participants. No differences were observed in error discoveries, number of incorrect answers, and reading time. However, for precision, recall, and average value of error discoveries, reflected light was better than transmitted light. In Experiment 1, effect of hardcopy and LCD readings differed in terms of finding errors. Nevertheless, we have not concluded that the specific causative factors are reflected and transmitted light. In the future, we should conduct experiments focusing on visual differences in order to continue the verification process.","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_4_biblio_info_10":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicPageEnd":"8","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"研究報告ヒューマンコンピュータインタラクション（HCI）"}],"bibliographicPageStart":"1","bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2015-03-06","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicIssueNumber":"2","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"2015-HCI-162"}]},"relation_version_is_last":true,"weko_creator_id":"11"},"created":"2025-01-19T00:18:54.434486+00:00","id":141302,"links":{}}