@techreport{oai:ipsj.ixsq.nii.ac.jp:00141302,
 author = {松山, 麻珠 and 池内, 淳 and Asami, Matsuyama and Atsushi, Ikeuchi},
 issue = {2},
 month = {Mar},
 note = {本稿では，校正を行う場面での読みにおける作業効率の差や校正者が受ける影響を測定するとともに，その要因を考察することを目的として二つの実験を行った．実験 1 では，24 名の被験者に対して，2 種類の問題を用いて実験を行い，校正作業の効率，正解率，主観評価いずれにおいても液晶ディスプレイに比べ，紙の方が優れていた．実験1の結果を踏まえ，その違いとなる具体的な要因を探るため，反射光と透過光の違いに着目した実験を 20 名の被験者を対象として実施した．その結果，誤り発見数・誤回答数・読書時間・主観評価について差は認められなかったものの，誤り発見数の平均値，校正作業の精度と再現率について反射光のほうが優位であった．, This study aims to measure effect of various media on proofreaders' efficiency and to consider causative factors for errors. We conducted two experiments: Experiment 1 compared hardcopy and liquid crystal display (LCD); Experiment 2 compared e-book media's screen types. In Experiment 1, 24 participants read about the same subject via different media, paper and LCD. Regarding errors, paper was better for efficient work and subjective evaluation. Based on the results of Experiment 1, we conducted Experiment 2 focusing on differences between reflected and transmitted light with 20 participants. No differences were observed in error discoveries, number of incorrect answers, and reading time. However, for precision, recall, and average value of error discoveries, reflected light was better than transmitted light. In Experiment 1, effect of hardcopy and LCD readings differed in terms of finding errors. Nevertheless, we have not concluded that the specific causative factors are reflected and transmitted light. In the future, we should conduct experiments focusing on visual differences in order to continue the verification process.},
 title = {表示媒体の違いが誤りを探す読みに与える影響},
 year = {2015}
}